Hi, help us enhance your experience
Hi, help us enhance your experience
Hi, help us enhance your experience
1372 Views
eMediNexus 07 March 2022
SAD was characterized by any two parameters of maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF)% pred, forced expiratory flow at 50% of forced vital capacity (FEF50%) pred, and forced expiratory flow at 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF75%) pred measuring <65%.
SAD was noted in 73 (60.8%) patients with CVA prior to treatment.
Findings of the study:
Table 1. Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with and without SAD
Patients with SAD | Patients without SAD | |
No. of patients [n (%)] | 73 (60.8) | 47 (39.2) |
Female patients (%) | 78.1 | 59.6 |
Mean age (years) | 41.9 | 35.4 |
Duration of cough (months) | 24 | 6 |
VAS | 5 (5–7.3) | 5 (5–7.0) |
Sputum eosinophil count (%) | 8.4 (2.8–32.8) | 8.0 (3.3–27.3) |
FeNO | 60 (25–93.8) | 51 (23–100) |
TIgE (KU/L) | 157.5 (55.9–517.5) | 135 (31.6–252) |
Data given as % or mean ± SD or median (IQR)
SAD was noted in more than half of the patients with CVA and was still present after short-term antiasthmatic treatment.
Reference
Yi F, Jiang Z, Li H, et al. Small Airway Dysfunction in Cough Variant Asthma: Prevalence, Clinical, and Pathophysiological Features. Front Physiol. 2022 Jan 13;12:761622.
What do you understand? While CVA patients with SAD may show improvements in cough VAS scores, sputum eosinophil counts, FeNO levels, and lung function, SAD may still persist following antiasthmatic treatment. SAD could play a key role in the prognosis of CVA. |
{{Article_Title}}
{{Article_Author}}
{{Article_Title}}
{{Article_Author}}